Top >
Other Musicians >
Tchaikovsky Symphony No. 7
This site introduces unknown composer Emanuel Bach (C. P. E. Bach).
This English version was translated from Japanese one by ChatGPT.
Tchaikovsky Symphony No. 7
Asked ChatGPT4o: "It seems that Tchaikovskyʼs Symphony No. 7 was left unfinished. How was it composed, and to what extent was it completed?"
Tchaikovskyʼs Symphony No. 7, sometimes referred to as the "Unfinished Symphony," has a complex history of composition and subsequent developments, sparking intriguing discussions among scholars. This symphony was conceived during Tchaikovskyʼs later years, from 1891 to 1893, but was never fully completed.
Composition History
-
Initial Conception:
- Tchaikovsky began conceptualizing a new symphony in 1891. This symphony was planned as a separate work from what would be his final Symphony No. 6, “Pathétique.”
-
Progress of Composition:
- In 1892, he sketched musical ideas corresponding to the first and third movements of Symphony No. 7. However, these materials were eventually repurposed for other works.
-
Reasons for Incompletion:
- Tchaikovsky was not satisfied with the concept of Symphony No. 7 and questioned whether his ideas were suitable for a symphony. Consequently, he decided to halt the work and use the material in a different form.
Reuse of Material
The musical ideas from the unfinished Symphony No. 7 were repurposed into other works as follows:
- Material from the first movement: Piano Concerto No. 3 (posthumous, Op. 75).
- Material from other movements: Andante and Finale for piano (Op. 79).
As a result, the symphony did not survive in its intended form, but glimpses of it can be seen through these works.
Later Completions
In the 20th century, researchers and composers attempted to reconstruct Symphony No. 7 based on Tchaikovskyʼs sketches and unfinished materials. Among these, the completion by Soviet composer Semyon Bogatyrev in 1957 is notable. However, there is criticism that this version may deviate from Tchaikovskyʼs original intentions.
Extent of Completion
Based on existing sketches, the following evaluations have been made:
-
First Movement:
- The themes and basic structure are relatively clearly outlined, but the orchestration and finer details remain incomplete.
-
Other Movements:
- While sketches exist, they do not form a complete structure. Some themes were repurposed for other works, leading to ambiguity in the symphonyʼs coherence.
Conclusion
Tchaikovskyʼs Symphony No. 7 remained unfinished because the composer was not satisfied with its concept, and the material was repurposed for other works. Although later completions are performed as “finished versions,” they do not necessarily fully reflect the composerʼs intentions. Therefore, this symphony is noted as Tchaikovskyʼs unfinished dream and a symbolic work that narrates his creative struggles.
Asked ChatGPT4o: "In Semyon Bogatyrevʼs completion of Symphony No. 7, how were the second and fourth movements created?"
In Semyon Bogatyrevʼs completion of Tchaikovskyʼs Symphony No. 7 (1957), the construction of the second and fourth movements is based on Tchaikovskyʼs unfinished sketches and other materials, with creative decisions by the editor. Below is an explanation of how each movement was constructed.
Second Movement (Andante)
-
Source Material:
- The main theme of this movement is drawn from several musical ideas left in Tchaikovskyʼs sketches for Symphony No. 7.
- Particularly, fragmented motifs from his piano works and songs were utilized.
-
Bogatyrevʼs Completion:
- Since Tchaikovskyʼs sketches did not provide a complete structure for the entire movement, Bogatyrev developed the themes and organized the form.
- He emphasized the romantic and emotional atmosphere favored by Tchaikovsky using strings and woodwinds.
- Bogatyrev complemented the movement by imitating Tchaikovskyʼs characteristic delicate orchestration techniques.
-
Characteristics:
- Designed as a graceful and lyrical slow movement, it harmonizes with the Andante movements in Tchaikovskyʼs other symphonies.
Fourth Movement (Finale: Allegro Vivace)
-
Source Material:
- The theme of the fourth movement is based on Tchaikovskyʼs sketches, other unfinished works, and material from Piano Concerto No. 3 (Op. 75).
- Motifs reflecting Tchaikovskyʼs ballet music and dance styles were also utilized.
-
Bogatyrevʼs Completion:
- To create a powerful climax for the finale, the themes were extensively developed.
- He particularly emphasized the use of brass and percussion, pursuing the splendor comparable to the final movements of Tchaikovskyʼs other symphonies.
- While the form is close to a rondo, Bogatyrevʼs own creativity is evident to compensate for the limitations of the material.
-
Characteristics:
- The movement is dramatic and festive, aiming for a finish that feels consistent with Tchaikovskyʼs symphonic finales.
- Some critics argue that this movement does not fully replicate Tchaikovskyʼs typical compositional style, but overall, it is considered a convincing completion.
Conclusion
The second and fourth movements, while based on Tchaikovskyʼs sketches and existing materials, were not fully structured, and Semyon Bogatyrevʼs completion played a significant role. Bogatyrev respected Tchaikovskyʼs style while filling in the missing parts to complete both movements. This completed version does not necessarily accurately reflect the composerʼs intentions, but it is valued as a work that presents the “what if” possibilities of Tchaikovsky.
Asked ChatGPT4o:
"Among the finales of Tchaikovskyʼs other symphonies, Symphony No. 6 is different. Could it be that Tchaikovsky abandoned Symphony No. 7 because he wanted a non-typical form that he could not realize? Bogatyrevk"
Tchaikovskyʼs Symphony No. 6, “Pathétique,” is unique in that its finale is markedly different from his other symphonies, concluding with a dark and sentimental Adagio. In contrast, regarding the conception of the unfinished Symphony No. 7, it is quite possible that Tchaikovsky was exploring a new direction beyond the traditional symphonic form.
Here is an analysis from that perspective.
Uniqueness of Symphony No. 6 and Tchaikovskyʼs Intentions
-
Characteristics of the Finale of Symphony No. 6:
- The finale of “Pathétique” possesses a character opposite to the traditional symphonic finale (which ends powerfully and gloriously).
- Tchaikovsky himself stated that Symphony No. 6 was “the most subjective work I have ever written,” indicating that he intentionally broke formal conventions to focus on emotional expression.
-
Challenge to a New Symphony Image:
- Symphony No. 6 is regarded as a work that opened new possibilities in the symphonic genre. It would not be surprising if he intended to further develop this direction in Symphony No. 7.
Possibility of Abandonment in Symphony No. 7
-
Aiming for a Non-Typical Form:
- During the sketching phase of Symphony No. 7, Tchaikovsky may have attempted to break away from the “usual symphony.”
- However, he may have ultimately abandoned it due to dissatisfaction with this direction.
-
Discomfort with Bogatyrevʼs Finale:
- The finale in Semyon Bogatyrevʼs completed version has a grand and powerful character similar to the finales of Tchaikovskyʼs other symphonies.
- Whether this aligns with Tchaikovskyʼs original intentions is debatable, and it is possible to speculate that Tchaikovsky might have wanted to attempt another unconventional finale like that of Symphony No. 6.
Reasons Tchaikovsky Abandoned Symphony No. 7
The following reasons are considered:
-
Unsatisfactory Conception:
- Tchaikovsky may have aimed for a new form, but his ideas might not have materialized.
- Particularly, he may have been uncertain about the direction of the finale.
-
Emotional and Psychological Factors:
- After writing Symphony No. 6, Tchaikovsky might have been emotionally exhausted and lacked confidence in taking on a new challenge.
-
Conflict Between Form and Emotional Expression:
- Feeling bored or limited by traditional symphonic forms, he might have been unable to concretize innovative ideas to transcend them, leading to his frustration.
Conclusion
It cannot be denied that Tchaikovsky might have been exploring a “non-typical” symphony like Symphony No. 6 with Symphony No. 7. The reasons for this challenge ending in frustration include the composerʼs internal conflicts and dissatisfaction with the limitations of the symphonic form.
Semyon Bogatyrevʼs completed version, while reflecting some of Tchaikovskyʼs intentions, likely does not fully embody the innovative direction he desired. Therefore, Symphony No. 7 is positioned as a work symbolizing Tchaikovskyʼs creative struggles in its “unfinished” form.