Revision of Keyboard Concerto Wq. 2

I asked ChatGPT4o: "How was the Keyboard Concerto Wq. 2 revised?"

Like his other early concertos, Emanuel Bachʼs Keyboard Concerto Wq. 2 underwent revisions that more clearly reflected his unique musical style. Below, we explain the specific direction and significance of the revisions in Wq. 2.

1. Changes in Form

In the early version, it is believed that the structure was based on the Baroque ritornello form, but the revised version may have adopted a freer and more flexible form.
Particularly in the first movement, it is speculated that the characteristics of the sonata form were clarified, allowing the themes to develop more dynamically between the solo instrument and the orchestra.

2. Enhancement of the Solo Instrumentʼs Role

With the revision, it is believed that there were more decorative and technical passages for the keyboard instrument (harpsichord or fortepiano).
The role of the solo instrument was enhanced beyond merely responding to the orchestra, actively developing themes and expressing its own character.

3. Development of Melody and Motifs

The melodies in the early version may have been relatively simple and functional, but the revised version is thought to have added ornamentation and expressive phrases, enhancing the characteristics of the Empfindsamer Stil.
Especially in the slow movement (second movement), it is possible that the solo keyboard instrument was emphasized in playing emotionally rich melodies.

4. Deepening of Harmony

In the revised version, it is believed that the harmonic progressions became more complex, pursuing more emotional and dramatic effects.
The development of tonality became bolder, with unexpected modulations and dissonances added, increasing the musical tension that captures the audienceʼs interest.

5. Improvement of Orchestration

In the early version, the orchestra part may have been limited to complementing the solo instrument, but in the revised version, the orchestra became more actively involved in the musical development.
The role of the orchestra diversified, and the dialogue with the solo instrument became more intimate.

Significance of the Overall Changes Due to the Revision

The revision of Wq. 2 demonstrates Emanuel Bachʼs process of breaking away from Baroque traditions while establishing his own Empfindsamer Stil. This revision emphasizes the following points:

Expressive music that appeals to the emotions of the audience.
Expansion of the technical and expressive role of the keyboard instrument.
Exploration of new approaches in harmony and form.

Through the revision of Wq. 2, it becomes clear that Emanuel Bachʼs concerto evolved beyond a mere Baroque framework to express the new musical sensibilities of his time.

For a detailed analysis of specific revision points, a comparison of manuscripts, early versions, and revised versions is necessary, but the direction of these changes can also be discerned from existing scores and research materials.

I asked ChatGPT4o: "Was the first movement of Wq. 2 in sonata form from the beginning?"

The first movement of Emanuel Bachʼs Keyboard Concerto Wq. 2 was not written entirely in sonata form from the early stages. Considering the compositional practices of concertos at the time and the evolution of Emanuel Bachʼs style, it is highly likely that the early version was based on the more traditional ritornello form.

Below, we explore this possibility:

1. Transition from Ritornello Form to Sonata Form

The mid-18th century, when Emanuel Bach was active, was a transitional period from the Baroque ritornello form to the Classical sonata form.
In early keyboard concertos (such as Wq. 1, Wq. 2), there are many examples of maintaining the framework of the ritornello form while incorporating elements of the sonata form.
- In the ritornello form, the orchestra presents the theme (ritornello), followed by the solo instrument playing episodes.
- Through revision, this may have approached sonata form, strengthening the structure where the orchestra and solo instrument handle themes more equally.

2. Possibility of the Early Version

In the early version, it is speculated that the first movement had strong characteristics of the ritornello form.
- The theme presentation was likely done by the orchestra, with the solo instrument focusing on playing decorative and improvisational passages.
- In the episodes, the tonality expanded, and the structure was likely characterized by contrapuntal development and prominent technical parts for the solo instrument.

3. Strengthening of Sonata Form Characteristics through Revision

It is believed that the following sonata form elements were strengthened through revision:

Contrast of Two Themes
The structure where the orchestra and solo instrument each present different themes, followed by development and recapitulation, may have become more pronounced.
Development of the Development Section
In the ritornello form, the development section is not emphasized, but in the revised version, it may have been expanded more creatively and dramatically.
Clarification of Tonal Structure
The tonal flow characteristic of sonata form, moving from the tonic to the dominant and back to the tonic, is presumed to have become clearer.

4. Characteristics of Emanuel Bach and the Empfindsamer Stil

Through revision, it is believed that the characteristics of the Empfindsamer Stil, such as the emphasis on emotional expression and the expansion of the role of the keyboard instrument, were added.
In the first movement, decorative and improvisational elements increased, creating a structure that transcended the ritornello form by merging with the freedom of sonata form.

Conclusion

The first movement of Wq. 2 is thought to have been primarily based on the ritornello form in its early stages. However, through revision, elements of the sonata form were added, and as the fusion of forms progressed, a more "Emanuel Bach-like" individuality was established. This process indicates that he was forming a new model for keyboard concertos during the transition from the Baroque to the Classical period.

I asked ChatGPT4o: "How was the second movement of Wq. 2 revised?"

Regarding the second movement of Emanuel Bachʼs Keyboard Concerto Wq. 2, it is believed that revisions emphasized the characteristics of the Empfindsamer Stil and enhanced expressiveness from the early version. Below, we consider the changes brought by the revision of the second movement.

1. Enhancement of Melodic Expressiveness

The melody in the early version may have been relatively simple and modest, but the revised version is thought to have added more decorative and expressive melodies, clarifying the emotional expression characteristic of the Empfindsamer Stil.
Particularly in the solo parts of the keyboard instrument, it is speculated that sigh-like motifs and the frequent use of ornaments (trills and appoggiaturas) strengthened the sentimental character of the entire movement.

2. Complexification of Harmonic Progression

In the early version, the harmonic progression may have been traditional and concise, but it is believed that the following changes were made through revision:
- Introduction of dissonances and unexpected modulations.
- The emotional depth of the minor key was expressed more deeply, adding progressions that left a strong emotional impression on the audience.
This likely highlighted the introspective and sentimental atmosphere characteristic of the Empfindsamer Stil.

3. Development of Form

If the second movement is based on a typical ternary form (A-B-A’), the following changes may have been made:
- The expansion of tonality in the middle section (B section) was emphasized through revision, adding more dramatic contrast.
- In the recapitulation (A’), the initial theme was ornamentally transformed, achieving musical depth rather than a simple repetition.

4. Expansion of the Role of the Keyboard Instrument

In the revised version, the improvisational and technical elements of the keyboard instrument may have been further emphasized.
- Decorative cadenza-like passages were added.
- The keyboard instrument not only played melodies but also took on a leading role in supporting harmony and expressing emotions.

5. Enhancement of Dialogue with the Orchestra

In the early version, the keyboard instrument may have been limited to a modest response to the orchestra, but the revised version likely saw the following changes:
- The orchestra responded delicately to the keyboard instrumentʼs melodies, intertwining the roles of solo and accompaniment more closely.
- String and woodwind instruments may have added new timbres and counter-melodies, enriching the overall texture.

Significance of the Revision

Through revision, the second movement of Wq. 2 is believed to have clarified the following characteristics:

Pursuit of Emotional Depth: The delicate expression of emotions, the core of the Empfindsamer Stil, was strengthened through melodies, harmonies, and ornaments.
Fusion of Keyboard Instrument and Orchestra: The solo instrument and orchestra developed music equally, achieving a musical dialogue that left a strong impression on the audience.
Balance of Form and Ornamentation: While decorative and free elements increased, formal balance was maintained, refining the musical structure.

Conclusion

The second movement of Wq. 2 is presumed to have evolved into a more delicate and emotionally rich work through revision compared to the early version. This revision vividly demonstrates Emanuel Bachʼs inclination towards the Empfindsamer Stil and his exploration of new expressive forms in keyboard concertos. The revised version is considered to reflect his mature style, offering a deeper musical experience.

Site search by Google

Parents

< Keyboard Concerto Wq. 2 in G major
< Revisions of C.P.E. Bachʼs Works